CO129-263 - Acting Governor Barker Governor Sir Robinson - 1894 [5-8] — Page 134

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed
Series Prev Next

the supervision of the Committee of inspection and should at least be certified by them. Mr. Nicolle is mistaken.

in this speaking of this document. It is not a statement of business done by the bankrupt. It is headed "Memo of accounts to be handed to the Official Receiver" and it is nothing else. It could not be certified by the Committee of inspection because they would know nothing about it till they inspected his books and accounts later on. The Bankrupt was allowed to manage and work his business himself, subject to inspection from time to time, but he did not wait for these inspections to pay monies he had in hand.

The next paragraph is, I regret to say, quite uncalled for and ought not to have been written. Its only object is again to attempt to throw blame on the Official Receiver and contains at the end a statement which is altogether unwarranted.

I must set it out at length and then proceed to state the facts. It follows:-

The paragraph is as follows:-

The voucher for the $363.99 consists of an account current between Messrs Reynell & Co. of Myoge and the bankrupt extending over several years. It shews a balance in favour of the former of $337.83. Some bunga-low belonging to the estate was sold to Messrs Reynell & Co. for $700 and the difference between this sum and

the balance in favour of the former of $337.83.

Edit History

2026-05-27 11:25:30 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
the supervision of the Committee of inspection and should at least be certified by them. Mr. Nicolle is mistaken. in this speaking of this document. It is not a statement of business done by the bankrupt. It is headed "Memo of accounts to be handed to the Official Receiver" and it is nothing else. It could not be certified by the Committee of inspection because they would know nothing about it till they inspected his books and accounts later on. The Bankrupt was allowed to manage and work his business himself, subject to inspection from time to time, but he did not wait for these inspections to pay monies he had in hand. The next paragraph is, I regret to say, quite uncalled for and ought not to have been written. Its only object is again to attempt to throw blame on the Official Receiver and contains at the end a statement which is altogether unwarranted. I must set it out at length and then proceed to state the facts. It follows:- The paragraph is as follows:- The voucher for the $363.99 consists of an account current between Messrs Reynell & Co. of Myoge and the bankrupt extending over several years. It shews a balance in favour of the former of $337.83. Some bunga-low belonging to the estate was sold to Messrs Reynell & Co. for $700 and the difference between this sum and the balance in favour of the former of $337.83.
Baseline (Original)
" the supervision of the Committe " of inspection and should ab " least be certified by them. Mr. Nicolle is mistaken. # in this speaking of this document. It مند not CL statement of business done by the bankrupt. It is headed "Memo of accounts to be handed " to the Official Receiver" and it is nothing else. It could not be certified by the Committee of inspection because they would know nothing about it till they inspected his books and accounts later on. The Bankrupt to allowed to manage and work his business himself, subject inspection from time to time, but he did not wait. AL for these inspections to pay monies he had in hand. 2 The next is I regret bo over paragraph say quite uncalled 131 to have for and ought not been written. Its only object. again it A14 attempt to throw blame. the Official Receiver and contains at the end a state- ment which is which is altogether warrenhed. I must set it out at and then proceed to state length the facts. follows:- The paragraph is as The voucher for the " $ 363.99 consists of A ALL account current between Messrs Reynell rei of Myoge " $ extending "shews a # every and the bankrupt several years. It balance in favour of " the former of $337.83. So bunga- low belonging 在 "estate was to the bankrupt sold to Messrs Rey. well &C for $700 and the dif- "ference between this sun and the for
2026-05-27 11:25:30 · Baseline
View content

" the supervision of the Committe " of inspection and should ab " least be certified by them. Mr. Nicolle is mistaken.

#

in this

speaking of this document. It

مند

not

CL

statement of business

done by

the bankrupt. It is headed "Memo of accounts to be handed " to the Official Receiver" and it is nothing else. It could not be certified by the Committee of inspection because they would know nothing about it till they inspected his books and accounts later on. The Bankrupt

to

allowed to manage and work his business himself, subject

inspection from time to time, but he did not wait.

AL

for these inspections to pay

monies he had in hand.

2

The next

is I

regret

bo

over

paragraph

say quite uncalled

131

to have

for and

ought not been written. Its only object.

again

it

A14

attempt to throw blame. the Official Receiver and

contains at the end a state-

ment which is

which is altogether

warrenhed.

I must set it out at

and then proceed to state

length the facts.

follows:-

The paragraph

is as

The voucher for the

" $ 363.99 consists of

A

ALL account

current between Messrs Reynell rei of Myoge

"

$

extending

"shews a

#

every

and the bankrupt

several

years.

It

balance in favour of

" the former of $337.83. So bunga- low belonging

在

"estate was

to the bankrupt

sold to Messrs Rey.

well &C for $700 and the dif-

"ference between this

sun and

the

for

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.